A ning isn't useful if people do not participate, and I stand accused of not participating in the nings to which I belong. It seems my list serves stay active all year long, and I participate in them all year. For a lark, I clicked on the web pages included in the user profiles in Teacher Librarian and Texas Librarian, and in most cases their web sites and blogs were current. The individual simply hadn't really participated in the ning for some time. What does that mean? Maybe some of us have established a social network via a listserve, and the ning is a duplication, another thing to keep current. Maybe it is generational, with the younger librarians, having grown up with facebook and myspace and establishing their networks in that platform, finding the ning as a familiar friend/mode. Maybe the ning provided another way to access a blog or web site.
Some of my child lit group tinkered with myspace, facebook, etc. this summer, and many of them thought it was faster to use the listserve and the blogs to share and discuss. At this time I prefer the blog, the list serve, and to a certain extent, the wiki. However, I have been known to change my opinion if I receive "new information."
2 comments:
You have some interesting observations on Nings here. Enjoyed reading.
I think each communication tool has it's fan base. I always loved email, and now I have really found the blog to be a comfortable space to communicate. We have sure learned a lot in this.
Post a Comment